The potential dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) has sparked strong and diverse reactions from educators across the country. Many fear that eliminating or significantly reducing the DOE’s role will have devastating consequences for public education, particularly for vulnerable student populations. Teachers express concerns over the loss of funding for critical programs such as special education, Title I initiatives for low-income students, and mental health services in schools. Without federal oversight, they worry that already strained schools will struggle with larger class sizes, fewer qualified teachers, and a lack of resources to support students with disabilities or economic disadvantages. Some educators, especially those in special education, warn that the loss of DOE support could set education back decades, making it difficult for students with learning differences to access the help they need. Others highlight that rural schools, which rely heavily on federal funding, could face closures, leaving students without viable alternatives. Additionally, teachers point to concerns about the elimination of federal monitoring of student achievement and the loss of funding for teacher training and research into best educational practices. However, not all educators view the move negatively. Some believe that dismantling the DOE will give states and local communities greater control over education policy, allowing them to make decisions that better reflect their unique needs. They argue that the DOE is an unnecessary bureaucracy that imposes excessive regulations and reporting requirements, taking time and resources away from actual teaching. These proponents see a future in which schools can allocate funds more efficiently and focus on students rather than federal mandates. Despite these differing perspectives, most agree that the decision will have far-reaching effects on students, teachers, and families. As debates continue, educators are grappling with what a reduced DOE role would mean for the future of public education, highlighting the ongoing struggle between federal oversight and state autonomy in shaping the nation's schools.